The Webmaster and his assistants have voted unanimously to award the
prestigious Five-Star Asshole award with the "Wayne's World" device
to John for his relentless and unceasing pursuit of excellence in
ignorance.
Since
this project is one of the most hilarious things I've ever done, perhaps a bit
of an introduction is in order. First of all, this project came to ME - I didn't
actively seek to do this - and I'm thankful that it DID "fall in my lap"
so-to-speak, because the telephone conversation that you have access to on this
page, replete and resplendent with Tourette's Syndrome
profanity, is probably one of the most ironically
hilarious things you'll hear on the Internet. I must warn the prudish -
you will hear more "F"-words in this recording in 52
minutes than you're likely to hear from a bar full of "drunken sailors" in a
year. From the very first moment I started speaking with "John",
I came completely out of character. Although you
may find this gut-splittingly funny, the underlying realization is that there a
a lot more people like John than one might imagine.... and that's a scary
thought!
I
don't care WHAT your point-of-view is; if you are in a discussion with someone,
isn't the purpose of ANY discussion to learn something, or to analyze something
from another perspective? John refuses to listen to the facts about 9-11-2001.
He has his ideas and his paradigms. My good friend who listened to the
recordings as I was processing them to post here commented,
"He {John}
sounds like a beach-bum surfer dude right out of the
Wayne's World movie". No matter what you PERSONALLY believe about the
events of 9-11, you should - if you're an adult that can handle the profanity -
download this conversation and listen to it.
It is NOT COPYRIGHTED, so please feel free to
make copies and pass them around. I am entertaining thoughts of putting this on
MySpace and iTunes.
Maybe I should warn the reader here.... there are assholes among us.
They are real. They believe whatever they see on the news, and they
"debate" by trying to talk
over
you, and insisting that they know what they know because
"I was there,
dude".
They refuse to accept empirical fact as fact, and as a result, they fail
to move on to the next phase of a logical analysis, fail to ask the
questions that are begging, and the end-result is that
THEY HAVE NO CLUE.
Having no valid argument to support their beliefs, they resort to
personal insults because they do not have the mental capacity to discern
the TRUTH for themselves. In such a case, calling someone "an asshole"
is not without a basis in fact, and is therefore wholly warranted.
I have done hundreds of essays on critical issues on my other Web sites.
In all of them, I have endeavored to support my position with
irrefutable evidence, and I always cite my sources so the reader knows
where the information came from, and can check it for him / her self. In
fact,
this article has
links you should follow if you have any doubts about what I say here.
People without a military intelligence background as I have, fail to
understand that
Ocam's Razor
does not apply when it comes to covert operations - these operations are purposely
designed to be full of "rabbit trails" and "wild goose chases" which
renders the facts unfathomable to the casual observer. In addition, the government has control of the media
- if you want to believe that or not, it is irrelevant to the fact - THE
MEDIA IS GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED - and
therefore the government has indirect but effective control over the "conclusions"
that most people come
to when presented with these manipulated data. It's hard to argue with
one's own conclusions, but that is precisely what you must do if you
ever want to make "sense" of international politics, war, and anything
to do with the government.
Things are NOT what they "appear to be"; your perceptions are being
manipulated by false data and propaganda, and if you believe the
government's "official" 9-11 story, or believe that "The
9-11
Omission
Report" is anything but a cover-up and a bullshit story from
cover-to-cover, let me tell you that your world... the way
you
see
the world... is what Scientology calls
"an apparency";
something that
appears to be.... but is actually NOT what it appears to
be.
You
are being LIED TO.... you are falling for classic MK-Ultra Mind Control
techniques right out of the
Russian
Brainwashing Manual of Psychopolitics... and this country is fast becoming a
Techno-Nazi
Dictatorship...
believe it, because it is TRUE!!
On Tuesday, August 7, 2007, I received an e-Mail from
John, challenging my views - written on several of my Web
sites (I assume he was looking at
www.Net4TruthUSA.com) - and at first, the writer did not specify
what, precisely it was that he disagreed with, but
he opened his
email with an insult to my intellect,
and that started this whole thing rolling. In the subsequent
e-Mails and reproduced correspondence, I have identified the other party
as "John" - because the communication (after laborious name-calling)
ended on a somewhat friendlier note than it began (see end of this
page).
There was a phone number in
the e-Mail message, so I called. The conversation that ensued is typical of a
conversation that one would have with someone who is dead-set in his
paradigms, and will believe what he wants to believe - even in
the face of physical evidence.
In a courtroom,
such a person would quickly be excluded in the jury selection phase,
because of outright refusal to hear another point-of-view - even when
that point-of-view presents empirical evidence that raises serious
questions about the case at bar.
We did agree on ONE thing though....
George W. Bush should be impeached.
As for Osama bin Forgotten...
that's another story altogether.
This man, believes that "terrorists" flew the planes that hit WTC 1&2,
and refuses to ask the question that logically arises when 7 of the 19
so-called "hijackers" the FBI said were responsible, turn up ALIVE!
He INSISTS that there was plane wreckage for flight 93 and the "plane"
that hit the Pentagon, when the FACT of the matter is that THERE WERE NO
ENGINES, LANDING GEAR, or ANY SIGN of an aircraft at EITHER site; Flight
93's wreckage was scattered over 8 square miles - inconsistent with a
plane crash, but fully what one would expect if the "plane" was shot
from the sky.
The TV documentary
"Flight 93" is TOTAL BULLSHIT... PURE HOLLYWOOD... and it has NOTHING to
do with what REALLY happened.
Efforts to get him to ask questions - or to challenge his own beliefs
(obviously based on the mainstream news media) - when presented with the
fact
that the
BBC
reported that building #7 collapsed twenty-two minutes before it
was demolished
(in an obvious, classic controlled demolition); and you can
watch the video
of the BBC reporter if you think it's bullshit - My efforts to get
John to
ask himself the logical questions.... FAILED.
Even presented with the fact that
Larry Silverstein_admitted that they_blew_up_building_7
on national TV; that he consulted with "the fire department" and they "PULLED"
the building, failed to get John to become suspicious and ask the
obvious questions.... By his own admission on the tape, even after
several attempts to try to explain WHY the BBC reporting that WTC #7 had
collapsed when it was still standing at the time of the report was
suspicious at the very least, he admitted
"it went right
over my head".
He finally rationalized his inability to formulate the question by
calling it
"a time issue".
I didn't get that, John... what do you mean? Time travel? Like Star
Trek?
What the
FUCK
is a "time issue"?
The fact is that WTC was a
CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION.
If you hesitate to believe it, then look at these two video clips and
tell ME what your "lying eyes" tell you.
Obviously, John has not seen the
video documentaries and hasn't
read the declassified
Northwoods Document,
hasn't listened to the Radio Program I did with Dr. Stan Monteith on
Operation
Phoenix, or read the book the CIA took off the shelves in 1973
titled "The
Plot To Seize The White House". It is doubtful that even if I
showed them to him, that he would "get it".
John says he will be in New York in a few weeks. I must admit, he
makes a wonderful "devil's advocate", and he provided worthwhile
fodder to put here for a good laugh...
but it's not funny. I welcome the on-camera debate
he says he wants to do with me, but it's doubtful that it will ever
materialize.
Perhaps he is not REALLY an asshole at
all, but just misinformed and brainwashed by the mainstream media like half the people in this
country - who WANT so badly to TRUST their government, and can't bring
themselves to believe that EVIL PEOPLE IN POLITICAL OFFICE are not above murdering innocent
civilians to rally support for an unjust, immoral, and criminal
war-crimes war.... and it is NOT like it didn't happen before in our own
history; i.e.: Pearl Harbor, The Tuskegee Experiments, Agent
Orange, USS Liberty, USS Cole, Gulf of Tonkin, Operation Paper Clip,
Operation Gladio, Operation Phoenix, and an interminable
litany of others too tedious to mention.
Those who fail to learn from their history, are destined to repeat it.
We are repeating the Reichstag Fire right now. You can choose NOT to
believe it if you want to; you can choose to rationalize that
planes
just vaporize into their constituent molecules when they hit buildings;
you can believe that the Pentagon has 200 cameras at the periphery of
the building and NOT ONE of them caught a clear image of a "plane"
hitting the Pentagon; you can believe that NORAD's war-games drills that
day were just a "coincidence", and that "jet fuel" which burns at a top
temperature of 1,100 degrees F. when fed pure oxygen, melted forty-seven 4-foot
thick, asbestos-coated steel columns rated at 2,800 degrees F - and melted them
all simultaneously; you can BELIEVE whatever you choose - this is America, and you have the
RIGHT to believe in the Tooth Fairy or Peter Pan if you choose to do so... but the
EVIDENCE... the physical, touchable, empirical evidence, and the
violation of the laws of physics that would have to have occurred for
the "official" government account of 9-11 to be true, DEMANDS that you
ask the logical questions.... and be prepared for the answers that might
shatter the cognitive "bubble" you may be presently living in.
And..... John....
Not-for-nuthin.... but...
STOP SMOKIN' THAT SHIT - IT'S FUCKIN' UP YOUR BRAIN!!!
And if you're not smokin' "The Chronic", perhaps it's exposure to
BushCronium that's the problem.
RECORDED PHONE
CALL
According to John, I'm "IN
SOME SHIT ALREADY" by recording this phone call. Tell you what... get
your cousin the lawyer to FUCKING SUE ME.... Go ahead. File your Notice
of Intent. You are SO full of
shit!!!
I must warn you: The language in the audio recording is not suitable for
children.... but if you live in America; it's not like they haven't
heard it before on TV. In the second part of the recording, the beginning 10
seconds is missing because he called me back within moments after he hung up on me the
FIRST time, and I had switched off my recorder.
(Left) click the button
and click "open" to
listen
with your media player (streaming)
(Right) click and
click "save
target as" to
save a copy
of the recording to your drive.
The following is
his latest e-Mail, after I informed John
that I was posting the telephone conversation here,
and my response. Notice that because he lacks the
facts to back up his position, he (again) resorts to
personal insults (he
started it in his first e-Mail, and I just chose to operate on his
level), and when I called him on one of the statements he made, he
threatens to "break my legs". As for his knowledge of the law, it also leaves a lot to be
desired, because recording a phone
conversation is legal anywhere in the USA -
as long as ONE
party of the conversation is aware that it is being recorded - I can't -
according to him - record the phone call because I'm in New York, and I
am "IN SOME SHIT ALREADY",
but he CAN legally make recordings of phone conversations,
because he's in OHIO, and OHIO is different.
Last time I checked, Ohio and New York were still in the USA, and still
(legally) under the US Constitution. Recording and wiretapping
(recording a phone call is NOT a wiretap) falls under the
Communications & Wiretap Act,
and recording a phone call is NOT a wiretap (but it IS admissible in
court as evidence). Different States have different privacy laws, but
all are more-or-less similar. If anyone has any doubt about what I'm
saying here, or doesn't - like John here - trust me as a "source", then
go read the law for yourself. This man is so full of shit and he is BEYOND
CLUELESS!!!
Perhaps
that comes from sitting on a couch with a remote control, two six-packs,
and filling his inebriated brain with MINDLESS FOOTBALL GAMES -
Precisely what the despots in Washington want you to do - while they
slowly rip your Civil Liberties right out from under you.... Yeah,
I looked at his Web site. I'm
FUCKIN' IMPRESSED!!! TYPICAL "Joe Six-Pak".
His e-Mail:
In a message dated
8/7/2007 2:02:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
John writes:
Feel free
{to post the recorded conversation}.
Anyone who would listen has the same problems as you, so
you all belong together anyway. And make sure you don't
edit it
{The beginning of the recording where I dial the number
and use his last name was deleted.} and also you should include our second
conversation as well. JUST A LITTLE WARNING. Any
manufacturing of our conversation by yourself WILL
RESULT IN LEGAL ACTION AGAINST YOU. I HAVE BOTH
CONVERSATIONS RECORDED AS WELL.
DO NOT TRY TO MANIPULATE
ANYTHING AS YOU HAVE TRIED TO MANIPULATE THE FACTS ABOUT
9/11. My cousin is
a lawyer in NYC and one of my best friends is a lawyer
in NJ. Not to mention my uncle and cousin are both NY
State policeman. Did you know that in NY you have to ask
permission BEFORE
RECORDING A CONVERSATION. OF COURSE NOT, SO AS YOU CAN
SEE YOU ARE IN
SOME SHIT ALREADY.
I don't have the
same problem being in Ohio.
Again, feel free to post what you like but Dave, make
sure it is accurate, because you will pay the price if
you try to manipulate anything. Good luck trying to find
a brain.
John
<<< end of
email >>>
MY RESPONSE:
See:
video documentaries to
download PROOF of what I say is true. Talk to me after you LOOK
AT THE EVIDENCE.
Tell you
what - Just to show you I hold no grudges, attached is a PDF
copy of my book
"The
Lie Detection Manual".
Read it
- maybe we are "on the same page" and letting minor shit get in
the way of our agreeing on the FACTS.
I will post the telephone conversation in
its entirety, and let people decide WHO has the CLOSED MIND....
They will be available on
www.AssholesAmongUS.com/willinglyignorant.htm
in about an hour from now. meanwhile,
LOOK AT THE VIDEOS from the link above, and THEN tell me it's
all BULLSHIT. You should get my book
Land of
Childhood's Fears - now THAT"S an eye-opener!!! If you DO
show up for an in-person debate, I don't want to get into any
more PERSONAL insults - STICK TO THE FACTS YOU CAN EMPIRICALLY
PROVE.
Please
don't try to impress me with the "my cousin is a lawyer" crap. I
was tutored PERSONALLY by Jerry The Jew.... I'll run RINGS
around your legal bullshit and flip you like a pancake at i-Hop's.
"The
danger with the use of circumstantial evidence is that of
logical gaps; subjective, inferential links of low probability
or insufficient degree"
-
People vs. Cleague 22 NY2d 363, 367, 292
The workability of a postulate is established by the degree to
which it explains existing phenomena [which is] already known;
by the degree that it predicts new phenomena which when looked
for, will be found to exist, and by the degree that it does not
require that phenomena which do not exist in fact, be called
into existence for its explanation.
-
Scientology Logic #19
The government's "Official"
story FAILS those two Axioms MISERABLY.
It would NEVER "fly" in a court of law.
However, VIDEOS OF A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION - as is CLEARLY
VISIBLE in several of the documentaries linked to - is cause for
INDICTMENT. Ask your lawyer cousin if a District Attorney
couldn't indict Larry Silverstein just on the admission he made
to the press. Then ask yourself WHY that son of a bitch isn't
sharing a cell with "Bubba" up in Sing-Sing!
<<< end of email >>>
Is Scientology?
- Id at 636
- L. Ron Hubbard ISBN# 1-57318-122-6
THIS IS ANOTHER
e-Mail from John - I
have added my comments
within the text in brackets:
First of all, who needs to
believe anything which was said by anybody! People
were there I have known my whole life. I WAS ON THE
PHONE
{he said it was an office phone; not a cell phone}
WITH MY FRIEND WHEN THE 2ND PLANE HIT!!!!
I know from EXPERIENCE AND EXPERIENCES OF OTHER
PEOPLE most everything about that unfortunate day on
9/11. People can manipulate videos, tapes, pictures,
anything to make something look any why they want
and to support any dumbass theory they want to put
up a charade about.
{sure... a hundred people who didn't know each other
manipulated videos to show 'squibbs' coming out of
BOTH towers AHEAD of the explosions so they could
blame George Bush}.
Your theories simply don't make common
{"common" - 80% of people in a Zogby poll said 9-11
was "an inside job"}
sense, and thanks for offering your "helpful" videos
and PDF files, but it's all really quite funny
{John finds the premeditated murder of 3,000
people 'funny' - NOTICE I ain't laughing!}.
It's amazing how gullible people can be
{yep! it sure is!}.
I respect people from the east coast because
generally I have found that they seem to have a bit
more brains than most, but you just go to show there
are always exceptions. You are part of what I like
to call the "exaggerationists". You will take any
side of view that you feel you want to promote
{I would like to BELIEVE that Osama bin Forgotten
was behind 9-11, but the EVIDENCE goes against it},
and then just go to the extreme to try to get people
to see that point of view, no matter how ridiculous
and absurd the accusations become.
Hey, I don't like Bush either, but Dave, be
reasonable man
{'reason' in this man's view, apparently means I
have to IGNORE the facts and smoke what he's
smoking}.
Use your brain, you know, common sense. All the crap
you have sent me about 9/11 is all someone's made up
story. Whether it be Larry Sliverstein or whoever,
as I said, the "theories" don't make sense. EVERYONE
COULD SEE THE PLANES FLY INTO THE BUILDINGS. PLANES
HAVE GASOLINE
{NO, John! Planes have JP-4, which is KEROSENE -
the same shit you light your barbeque with. When was
the last time your barbeque grill MELTED when you
lit the charcoal? - He seems to forget that while
(he says) Asbestos-coated steel MELTED, people who
were ON THE FLOORS where the planes crashed, were
STANDING IN THE WINDOWS. Why didn't the PEOPLE melt?
Huh??}.
WHEN THE PLANES CRASHED IT STARTED A FIRE
{big deal... a fire... which smoldered and WENT OUT
before the towers collapsed}.
GEE, GASOLINE
{KEROSENE}
AND FIRE.....YOU DO THE MATH
{2+2=7 according to you}.
Sorry, Dave. But I can't believe you are this
friggin gullible man
{I'm not the one who is gullible. You are the one
who blew off all the evidence I sent you as
someone's made-up story... why? You want to believe
what you want to believe. You already made up your
mind, so why should anyone trouble you with the
FACTS?}.
The sad thing is there are other people that believe
the same crap because of idiots like yourself who
have to look for crap to scream CONSPIRACY rather
than use your common sense and the experience of
PEOPLE WHO WERE THERE
{Most of the people who "were there" are DEAD. There
are survivors who escaped who were not allowed to
testify - but who have told their stories, and back
up everything I have said}.
Again, I have to say how shocked I am as I actually
think you kind of make a good point about some stuff
on the rest of your website, but again it seems like
you take these points to a level which becomes
fantasy instead of reality
{again, he has no counter-argument}.
Like I said, common sense has to come in somewhere
dude
{Yeah? start by looking at the FACTS instead of
talking out your ass}.
If I have time I'll check myself out later
{he's going to psycho-analyze himself - may I
suggest a bit of Dianetics auditing?},
as I can imagine it might actually be kind of funny.
BUT I STILL INTEND ON SUING YOU
{Please! I'm laughing so hard my fuckin' kidneys
can't take it! Mercy! mercy!}
FOR TAPING ME WITHOUT PERMISSION, SO I'LL BE IN
TOUCH SOON
{I think you need to go to your county courthouse
and look up the Wiretap act. I can tape anyone I
want to tape. When you make an ASSHOLE of yourself,
you become fair game - send your cousin the lawyer
over with the papers}.
There was
a subsequent phone conversation after I posted this (the third
conversation on the recording), in which John and I agreed to cease the hostilities, and we
"agreed to disagree" on some things, but we do have more-or-less the
same opinion of Grorge "Dubya" -
he should be IMPEACHED!
John said It would be
wonderful if I could also post the (3rd) conversation on the Web site"
as well.
I don't think that anyone can ever influence John's tightly-held
beliefs, because he just (by his own admission) will NOT entertain any
other point-of-view, or even look at any evidence that might shatter the little
"neat package" fantasy world he lives in, where everything is
as simple as it looks on the surface, and OUR government is comprised of
ANGELS
who wouldn't
THINK
of harming their own citizens in such a sinister PLOT - the shit he says
I MADE UP - No, not the
US-of-A!!
- Better go read the
Northwoods Document
before you say that, John!
I certainly
hope we can meet one day for a "Podcast interview", just as he offered
in the beginning. We shall see.
As an informational note here, I have spent the better part of the day putting
this one page together. I certainly hadn't PLANNED this; I was
working on
another project when I got his first e-Mail... but I admit, it WAS
interesting. Everything is out in the open here; and although the foul
language is atrocious in the recorded conversation (I apologize - but
you were warned); it serves to
illustrate that people (including me) are very passionate about their
beliefs.... even people who believe in government-concocted lies,
bullshit stories, and CIA-manipulated media coverage. The government's
"official" account of the events of 9-11 are by definition - a
"conspiracy theory". I fully understand the need for people to feel that their
government is operating in their best interests, and that the PEOPLE
have control over the politicians they elect - or
think
they elect - to office. I'm sorry to burst your bubble people, but it is
my considered opinion; and I say it with great trepidation, but we
haven't had a REAL president in this country since JFK was murdered.
Believe what you will; it's a free country (last time I checked).
Tomorrow, when I wake up, that situation may change. I'm not the ONLY
one saying it. If I'm an asshole, then I'm gonna' do my damned-est to be
a FREE asshole.... eternal vigilance... that is the price we pay for
what is left of our liberty. If we let any more of it go, we will get
the government we deserve.
"Those who will trade
their liberty for security will have neither liberty nor security."
(Who the hell is it that
said that?)
On August 8th I get another e-Mail from John demanding "compensation"
for the use of the recording on this Web site. Since this is probably
one of the most hilarious pieces I've ever done, I told him that I'd
give him a few incoming links from my other sites from wherever pages
he thought were appropriate. I also offered to use my SEO software to
register his Web site with the search engines. I then get back a message
that
he's going to SUE ME
for posting this recording without his permission. If you'll notice, at
the bottom of each page of this Web site - it states CLEARLY that
phone calls to me MAY be recorded.
I record my OUTGOING calls as well, when I think I may have need of a
record of the call. It's all
PERFECTLY LEGAL, and
falls under the
"one party consent" statute,
and you can
Look it up
if you want to, but here is the synopsis:
"Federal law allows recording of phone calls and other electronic
communications with
the consent of at least one party
to the call. A majority of the states and territories have adopted
wiretapping statutes based on the federal law, although most also have
extended the law to cover in-person conversations.
Thirty-eight states and the
District of Columbia permit individuals to record conversations to which
they are a party without informing the other parties that they are doing
so. These laws are
referred to as "one-party consent" statutes, and
as long as you are a party
to the conversation, it is legal for you to record it".
I am the
consenting party,
John. Besides, since you haven't been identified other than my calling
you by your first name (The beginning of the recording where I dial your
number, and where I use your surname has been deleted from the
recording),
there is no "injury" you could claim....
except maybe I hurt your feelings for calling you "an asshole".... I
apologize, John.... there, there. And since
you gave me your permission
to begin with, you haven't got a legal leg to stand on. And
not-for-nothing, John, making threats to
people over the phone is a
class E felony
in Ohio and in New York....
look it up. You might want to consider that before you start
something that will call the recordings into evidence in a court of law.
Sorry, John, THE
RECORDING STAYS.
LIVE WITH IT!!
BTW: This is the
most hilarious shit I ever did!
Why is the
simple, empirical TRUTH a magnet for every ASSHOLE on the planet? I sent
John the following:
II I
I am listening to a CD I made of our phone calls. In the SECOND
conversation, I talk about BUILDING #7 - OBVIOUSLY, you thought I
was talking about one of the Trade Towers.... that is why you
disagreed and misunderstood when I said THERE WAS NO PLANE THAT HIT
THE BUILDING. Building 7 was the 47-story office building 1-1/2
blocks away from the WTC towers... it fell at about 5:45PM that
night. Google "WTC Building 7" and see or go to
www.prisonplanet.tv
Page on the site updated with links.
If Jozie is home tonight at 9PM I'll have him speak with you.
<<< end of email >>>
This is the
rambling piece of idiocy I received as a response from this pea-brain
imbecile:
I put my comments in the text in this color:
{brackets}
Once again, your attitude only
goes to show the true piece of shit that you are
{from his first email he can't avoid calling
people names}. I can't wait to see you in person
{Yeah, sure! FLY OUT HERE JOHN! - I'll meet
you at JFK}, but please do me a favor. Take a breath mint so
I don't have to smell your shit breath from your head being so far
up your ass {isn't he fuckin' innovative and
creative with the insults? A real talent, isn't he?}.
You just started a war
{I'm a Vietnam Vet - I'll show you a
WAR, asshole!}
you don't want fuckhead. I was being nice, now you will deal with
the consequences {oooohhh! I'm fuckin'
trembling!}. YOU MADE YOUR OWN GRAVE
FUCKHEAD {is that another
THREAT?}.
ANY FURTHER CONTACT WILL BE CONSIDERED SPAM AND
WILL BE REPORTED AS SO {"reported" to WHO, your
SPAM filter?}. Any further phone calls will be considered harrassment
{doesn't even know how to spell "harassment"
and disregards his spell-checker}
and reported as such {SUE ME, DIPSHIT!!!
- from the jail cell where you'll be when I have you ARRESTED for
making threats}.
I don't have time {to}
be dealing with scammers who call themselves WebPastor and have a
pea for a brain and can only play hardass by email and by phone,
because you sure as hell wouldn't be giving me
your sorry excuse for an attitude if I
were in your face
{YOU WANT TO BET?}.
THAT IS A GUARANTEE!!! Keep my stuff
{it's
MY STUFF, John!}
on your website, it doesn't bother me
{we SEE how much it doesn't bother you, don't we?}. People
will actually see how much of an ass you really are and how much of
an ass they themselves are {good show, John!
Insult the audience. Everybody's an asshole except you.}, I
don't know {no, you don't - OBVIOUSLY}.
You are nothing more than an unthinking, angry,
stupid, and disgusting excuse for a human being and therefore I am
no longer going to let you use me to promote
{I don't need your sorry ass to promote a fuckin' thing!}
your dumbass bullshit. As I stated this does
not require a response. You need to do what you need to do
and I will do what I need to do and we will see what happens.
I guarantee you, WebPastor Dave
{I run the ministry at
www.Net4TruthUSA.com},
you don't know me. And by the time I am done
you will wish you hadn't. {ooohhh! is
that ANOTHER THREAT? - How many "counts" is that now?} As I
stated, I tried to be reasonable with you, but as I stated in our
last phone conversation, talking with you is like talking to a
stump. Try and use your brain for good in the future, instead of
trying to scam people
{what scam is that? did I try to sell you the
Brooklyn Bridge or something?}, and maybe things
will get better for you {it's as good for me
as it gets - I think}. As I said, I have better things to do than spend
my time sparring with an idiot who is not equipped with even the
common sense to carry on a civil conversation
{I guess "civil" to you means agreeing with
your MK-Ultra induced dementia}. It will take me some time to
get around too {I ain't holding my breath},
but as I said, you will have brought any
consequences for your own actions on yourself, and you seem
to welcome them, so it shouldn't be much of a problem for you
{no, not when I'm dealing with a first-class
bullshit artist "cell-gangsta'" like you}. You really
shouldn't be so rude to people you don't really know anything about
{you really shouldn't make
Threats
on the phone, especially when you know
it is being recorded; you could end up doing time}.
Could come back to bite you in the ass
{what is that? "count" seven on the threats?}.
Again, you made your feelings known. PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND ANY
FURTHER AND GET YOURSELF IN ANY DEEPER THAN YOU ALREADY HAVE
{I'm fuckin' scared, John! Can't you tell?}.
GOODBYE AND TRY NOT TO BE SUCH A LOSER FOR THE REST OF YOUR DAYS
HERE.
<<< end of email >>>
People who don't have BRAINS enough to argue a point with EVIDENCE,
or with a coherent bit of reasoning, usually resort to
threats.
Hey John! Go ahead and get "in my face",
"duuuude" - I GOT SOMETHIN' FOR YA
- You can take that
to the bank. I should really have this asshole arrested and hauled
in for making threats, but he's just a bunch of hot air, as is
evident in the 52 minutes of phone conversations where he couldn't
stop his incoherent "surfer-dude" babbling for 60 seconds to listen
to what I was saying, and where he refused to even look at the video
links I sent him. Listen to it - it's really PATHETIC. I'm just
sorry I couldn't get through; In retrospect, it is almost as if he
were RETARDED or something.... brain-dead or some shit. He has
enough wit to throw the names and the epithets around, though... a
real PRO. A professional bullshit artist, and a consummate imbecile;
the "Joe six-pack" of the new
Techno-Nazi Orwellian America - the
epitome' of and the creme'-de-la-creme' of
FLAMING, GAPING ASSHOLES!
HOMELAND SECURITY: CONDITION RED
- ASSHOLES AMONG US
OK. I'll accept that. You can understand my
attitude with you then I would hope. I still have a lot of crap
to do right now though as I haven't finished my Raiders preview
yet and still have a lot more stuff to do after that. Everything
sucks even worse when you have no income, too. Anyway, 2 of the
fantasy football leagues I am in are total of $45000 to the
winner, not to mention I have my own website with Blog so I just
have a lot of work to do right now, and not a lot of time, so
I'll try to check your stuff out by tomorrow then. Glad to see
it was a misunderstanding but I am still a little shaky on the
theory, so we'll see. I'll let you know as soon as I can catch
up on my work then. Probably by tomorrow.
<<< end of email >>>
What? No
insults? This
thing is getting hard to call. Is there any HOPE that I can
FINALLY have a decent conversation and at least have John LOOK
at what I sent him.... and THEN decide what he believes? With
this last e-Mail, I feel God has blessed me. He has, because of
His infinite mercy (and probably my endless "patience of Job"
{well, it was fun, too, I won't
lie}) "increased my coast" as it says in the prayer of
Jabez.
As the one of the songs in my "Make
a Jouful Sound" (download it free) collection goes:
"Who am I, that thou
shouldst love me?..... who am I, that you'd give yourself for
me?.... and who am I?, and what have I done... that you love
me?"
It may seem a dichotomy; a non-sequitur; an inconsistency
for someone like me to even be involved with a Web site like
this.... but I'm only following the perfect example;
Jesus Christ dined with the Publicans, and
associated with prostitutes, thieves, murderers, and the
veritable scum of the Earth. I
thank God every day that I have
mere ASSHOLES to contend
with.... what I'm afraid of is that if I get "good" at dealing
with the assholes, I might be "promoted" to a more difficult
job; God forbid I should
be called to minister to politicians!
(Left) click the button
and click "open" to
listen
with your media player (streaming)
(Right) click and
click "save
target as" to
save a copy
of the recording to your drive.
